Site Map Español CLT News Spirituality Prayer Resources New Members Justice & Peace 1996 Chapter 2002 Chapter Documents Contributions Edmund Rice Links History Postulator's Desk Renewal Contact Us

Berkeley Fitzhardinge

Pick a Topic :  

Search:

Home
Up a Level

Other Topics:
David Gibson
J McDonald
Hugh Sharpe
Joe Connolly
Ronald Tallon
Sergius Herrick
Ben Boonen
Con Hurley
Berkeley Fitzhardinge
Robert Callen
J J Cahill

New Logos From Hugh Sharpe and Berkeley Fitzhardinge

 

Descriptive Notes about this group of logos
   

The Logo is based on the spiral form which has significance in several places in the Edmund Rice Icon. The form creates a link between the logo and the strong Edmund Rice focus of the icon. There are two forms of the logo: a simplified version as at the left and a detailed version.

The colours used are:

Gold for the central core in keeping with the use of gold in Icons to represent destiny/eternity/the spirit.
Red to represent our fire/flame of zeal, love and dedication.

Green to represent our Irish origins as well as Hope and the Future -- concepts that inform our personal lives and are also our main motivation - improving future prospects for our clients.

Blue to represent the light of day, the earth and an authentic human life into which our members and our clients move with increased confidence. It gives us glimpses of the ‘blue planet’ which underlies our works and hopes, and a planet we are learning to cherish spiritually and ecologically. Blue also represents our traditional devotion to Our Lady.

White, Burnt Siena and Brown represent the internationality of the membership of the Congregation, (people of every colour). The colours also symbolise the fields of our work: Those marginalised in the first, second and third worlds of human development. In the simplified design these concepts are contracted into the extra colour used (mauve in the above example. Mauve is also symbolic of respect).
 

Shape and content:

The shape
is ovoid (egg-shaped) to symbolise the constant re-birth that is a challenge to the members who will wear it as well as grounding ourselves in earthly ministries.

The design
is not symmetrical to symbolise the complexity of living a lay religious life with active ministry among those on the margins.

The circle
symbolises both the source and goal of our living: to deepen spiritual values in both our own members and clients.

The cross
symbolises our Christian origins and goals. In combination with the circle it also symbolises food and learning as well as commitment and eucharist.

 

The spiralling forms
represent flames of love, action, contemplation, dedication and sacrifice. They can also symbolise the three vows as they enrich the individual member and facilitate outward-looking mission.

They can also represent both members and clients in a constant inwards and outwards movement – inward towards the values that enrich life, - outwards to embrace humanity and its needs. The upper smaller form can be taken to represent youth and care for the young and the formation and pastoral care of our new members. The outspread and embracing arms represent inclusiveness, working and celebrating together, prayer and praise. The spiralling figures can also be seen as bells, announcing good news to all: “to proclaim liberty to captives and to the blind new sight, to set the downtrodden free, to proclaim the Lord’s year of favour” (Luke 4:18-19)

The three outermost circular shapes:
As well as humanising the spiralling forms, symbolise the importance of communal prayer (a memory of the rosary beads which was an important early devotion). They are also symbols of world cultures – the dot painting of remote Australian Aboriginal Tribes, and the bead craft of the African Masai.

 


Major design aims were to create a logo that:

  1. Is totally unique – a vital quality of a good logo. No logo is immediately identified by observers. A good logo, though, because of its unique design, involves a shorter learning curve.

  2. Has an inherent sense of movement ie is not static.

  3. Has a ‘wow’ factor – making people ask about its significance.

  4. Speaks to both the wearer and the observer of the aims of the organization which are always in process ie inspires the wearer and educates the observer.

 

 

 

The image is taken from the Edmund Rice Icon.  My suggestion is that the icon is a source of several concepts which could be developed as logos, in particular any of the various spirals.

359a is merely an example and a logo could be developed using it as a source of inspiration.  Please ignore part of the founder’s head which I could not easily remove.

 

Up to three spirals may be able to be accommodated in the smallest logo.

A small heart, star or cross could stand alone at the centre or be combined with a coloured circular shape.

 

The spirals would symbolise our movement inwards or into the depths of human and religious life (reflective/spiritual/educative/affirming) combined with our movement outwards (internationality/margins/inclusivity/needy/ignorant).

Such a design would not only capture our present and future entity, but be a constant challenge to the wearer of the goals of our Congregation and Edmund Rice Family.

 

A series of coloured dots around the perimeter of the logo could symbolise the people we work with/for/among, the rosary (devotion to Our Lady) as well as stand as cultural symbols (Aboriginal sand or dot painting, Masai craft with coloured beads).

Alternatively, the three spirals could end in coloured oval/round shapes, turning them into human symbols that are rooted in the central symbol and moving outwards towards humanity.

 

The possibilities that can arise from a logo artist working from these ideas enthuse me for the following reasons:

 

  1. The design would have a uniqueness about it that logo versions strongly based on a cross form may not have.  I believe that no logo informs the viewer about the identity of the  wearer at first sight.  A good logo, by its unique design, is remembered by the viewer from previous associations and gradually comes to be defining of the wearer.  For example the Mercy Cross is readily recognisable, not because it tells us of the Mercy Congregation. It is instantly recognisable because it has a unique design and as well many Mercy Sisters wear it and it is used as Logo for Mercy enterprises as well as letterhead etc and so has become a familiar symbol.

     
  2. The spiral-based design has an active symbolism which asks for an explanation. 
  3. It can be made into a colourful design which attracts attention and can become memorable.
  4. It can include a cross symbol without being based on the cross shape

 

 

 

 

I believe that the process is too focussed on endpoints eg a particular logo design.
My opinion is that the quest for a logo be widened to include the uses we would make of a logo - eg

  • Larger or more complete forms in posters, wall hangings etc
  • Versions that might be used on walls of houses, buildings etc
  • Smaller Versions for publications, letterhead, internet use
  • Smallest versions for use on ties, tie-pins, embroidered on shirts etc.
In my opinion this widens the scope (size, content, colours, symbols) of the logo.  For example the full logo may include several elements from which one or two are used in smaller versions. 

For a logo that is personally worn, someone suggested that for a man an engraved shaped or enamelled ring might be more appropriate than a brooch as currently worn.
The personal logo would need to be available in versions to suit the cultures and dress customs of our members.  For example an around the neck version might be an optional alternative to suit forms of African dress or hot climates where ties are not worn.

Personally I do not think a traditional cruciform shape is a good start, neither is celtic colouring or tracery.  We need to display not our origin but our present (which soon will become the near past as the logo will have a life of many years).  Presently we are an international congregation of laymen (not clerics and among male wearers crosses have been associated with clergy)  with our current impetus coming out of Africa and Asia (India) and our work increasingly being social as well as educational in scope.

A textual discussion not tied to producing a considered preferred logo might help your committee find its way in this matter.
Regards
Berkeley Fitzhardinge HSP