|
Part Two of A Prophetic Call to a Quest for Justice (Part One is listed below) The following are suggested action steps that may be taken if we desire to move the congregation in a response to "a prophetic call to a quest for justice." They all follow on the insights made within the chapter document, The Heart of Being Brother.
2 To engage the congregation members on whether there would be a prophetic purpose served in establishing a central commission of the Congregation that would focus on the single issue of the rights of children. At a time when accusations of abuse are still levelled, would this be a prophetic stance.
Questions to Individual members - What is your involvement in social justice issues? If you are involved in a specific project, give a short description. What spirituality sustains you in your involvement in social justice issues? Any suggestions for how the central congregation can set up a commission on justice and peace that focuses on international issues aligned with our ministry to youth?
Questions to Leadership - Outline the work for justice that is happening in your province, region or area? What organizations have you for social justice at the province, region, or area level? Any suggestions for the formation of an international commission focussed on international issues aligned with our ministry to youth? 3 Bring together a group of brothers who are involved in justice and peace issues around the congregation. At this stage the priority should not be geographical representation but expertise in the area. Have them brainstorm what could be a possibility for a commission on justice, peace and integrity of creation for the general congregation. 4 Just as we have an RRG (Renewal Reference Group) and a CRT (Congregational Renewal Team) to foster renewal around the congregation, this new commission would have as its mandate a focus that is immediately connected with our charism and ministry among young people. Thus, for example, the focus might be to assist the whole congregation on issues around the rights of children that may need to be addressed through networking with groups on the local level, through advocacy, through engagement and developing relationships with workers in the field, as well as through our network of educational outreach. 5 This focus as a congregation might lead to a network/program that would provide to the members of the congregation that dislocation that comes with regular contact with poor and marginalised people. The particular justice issues around the rights of children could be such as the following (taken from JPIC manual, Rome): child labour - an estimated 200 million children are forced to work. child prostitution - one million are forced into prostitution each year. street children - over 100 million under the age of fifteen. commerce of children’s organs. half the refugee population are children - there are estimated to be about 30 million refugees and 100 million displaced persons. one child in three in the developing world is undernourished. each day over 40,000 children die fro want of food and inexpensive medicines. The list goes on and on. And the list in not limited to developing countries and regions. For example, ‘child soldiers’ exist not merely in war zones in Africa, but among the gangs of developed world cities. 6 The importance on selecting one issue to focus on is to be able to offer some strong advocacy as a congregation that is international and has spent numerous lifetimes in ministering among young people of the world. It would be a natural development that the rights of children and issues of children at risk would hold a preferential option for us as a justice issue. And it would be prophetic for us to take it up at this time in our history. So, where do we go from here? Do we move on the proposal of looking towards some congregation wide centre/commission/office that would take up the mantle of this chapter insight and move forward with it? If that is to become an real option, there are a number of questions and ideas. They revolve around where, who, cost and focus.
Where? The ‘where’ question seems easy enough. If something new is being created, the dynamics of the thing being formed must motivate the ‘where.’ The where should not be someplace we already have because we have it. If an international commission is set up in the future it should be set up where its focus would most likely have the greatest impact and service. International NGO’s and service organizations locate themselves close to other international organizations. We mustn’t go down the road of setting up in Rome, for example, because it is the centre of the RC Church.
Who? The who question should also be easy to answer, namely who would best have the energy, knowledge and passion to create something new for us that would touch all regions of the congregation, and commit us to speak out on the issues that we as Christian Brothers should feel flow from our living vowed religious life in service. It bears mentioning that the ‘who’ should not determine the ‘where’. There is also an auxiliary question about the ‘who’, namely whether the spearhead of this new entity should be lay or religious.
Cost? The ‘cost’ question is a real one, and must be faced squarely and not assigned some pious explanation about providence. Setting up an office or commission will cost money. Perhaps it is necessary that we look closely on how we already spend money as a congregation, right across the board, from central headquarters to the local groupings of people around the world. We need to ask these questions of ourselves, "Do we have resources to establish something as fundamental as this?" and then, "Where can we cut back on our expenses in order to fund this new entity of a renewed and restructured congregation?"
Focus? The ‘focus’ question is something that we need clarity about. We are Christian Brothers. We brought a history to the Chapter of 2002. And that history should help us to determine how best to focus the whole congregation on issues of justice. As we have often said in the past, no matter how many needs are around us, we can only begin to deal and help on a few of them. Compared to other religious organizations we are a small operation. Therefore, should we focus our resources and energy on one board justice issue congregation-wide? This is where the bringing together of ‘voices’ from around the congregation would be needed. We need an issue that is not a developing world issue or a developed world issue, but just a global, human issue.
Conclusion This proposal is hopefully on the table for the consideration of the leadership teams, and all the brothers and ERN people to consider. This website is offered as a means to foster Brothers and ERN people to contribute to a discussion of this issue and how to respond congregationally to this challenge to a prophetic call to justice. January 2004
Part One As we stand today as Christian
Brothers almost forty years after Vatican II we realize that we have only just
touched the surface of changes in thinking, attitudes and structures that will
continue our congregation's being sent on mission in a contemporary, focussed
way. Br. Nick Morris (Rome) |
|
|